BEAR v. KENOSHA COUNTY


22 Wis.2d 92 (1963)

BEAR and others, Respondents, v. KENOSHA COUNTY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 20, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Mittelstaed, Heide, Sheldon & Hartley of Kenosha, and oral argument by W. A. Sheldon.

For the respondents there was a brief by Phillips & Richards of Kenosha, and oral argument by David R. Phillips.


HALLOWS, J.

The defendant contends the judgment is not supported by the evidence mainly because all three of the plaintiffs' experts erroneously assumed that before the taking the plaintiffs had free and uncontrolled access to Highway 50 and, therefore, their opinions of the value should be disregarded. If no right of access existed, the opinion of value based upon such assumption might be disregarded under the rule of Pressed Steel Tank Co. v. Industrial Comm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases