1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 377 P.2d
  5. 377 P.2d 741 (1963)
 

BINGHAM v. BACH

No. 20221.

377 P.2d 741 (1963)

E. B. BINGHAM et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Ted BACH, Arthur S. Bowman and Benjamin E. Sweet, individually and as members of the Civil Service Commission in and for the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, Defendants, Byron J. Haze et al., Intervenors, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.

Rehearing Denied January 28, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis R. Salazar, Herbert W. Delaney, Jr., Bailey Belfor, Roger L. Simon, Denver, for plaintiffs in error.

Robert S. Wham, City Atty., Ty R. Williams, Asst. City Atty., Denver, for defendant in error Ted Bach, et al. as the Civil Service Commission, of the City and County of Denver.

Henry & Keating, Denver, for defendants in error, Byron J. Haze, et al.

MOORE, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and are employed as policemen by the City and County of Denver. We will refer to them as plaintiffs. Defendants in error Bach, Bowman and Sweet are members of the Civil Service Commission of the City and County of Denver. We will refer to them as the Commission. The other named defendants in error are policemen employed by the City and County of Denver who appeared in the trial court as intervenors...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases