1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 13 N.Y.2d
  5. 13 N.Y.2d 93 (1963)
 

MTR. OF GROSS v. MARY HERBERT FASHIONS

13 N.Y.2d 93 (1963)

In the Matter of the Claim of Edna K. Gross, Respondent, v. Mary Herbert Fashions (Better) et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 10, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Kelly and Eugene T. O'Leary for appellants.

Morris P. Glushien, Wilbur Daniels and Seymour Bernstein for Edna K. Gross, respondent.

No appearance for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI concur with Judge FULD; Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the determination of the Workmen's Compensation Board.

FULD, J.

The question presented is whether or not the claimant was "in employment", within the meaning of section 203 of our Disability Benefits Law (Workmen's Compensation Law, art. 9), at the time she was injured so as to entitle her to disability benefits from her employer, one of the appellants herein.

The claimant, a factory employee, began working for the appellant, a dress manufacturer, in 1953...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases