1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 80 N.J.
  5. 80 N.J. Super. 25 (1963)
 

KINGSTON BITUMINOUS, ETC. v. N.J. TURNPIKE AUTH.

80 N.J. Super. 25 (1963)

192 A.2d 836

KINGSTON BITUMINOUS PRODUCTS CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 27, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Waldron argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Backes & Backes, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph R. Postizzi argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., general counsel).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Kingston Bituminous Products Co. (Kingston) appeals from a Superior Court, Law Division judgment dismissing its action in lieu of prerogative writs, and defendant New Jersey Turnpike Authority (Authority) cross-appeals the dismissal of its counterclaim for damages.

I.

On March 21, 1963 the Authority publicly advertised an invitation for bids for Contract No. R-140, calling for resurfacing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases