A. L. MECHLING BARGE LINES, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants.
United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 14, 1963.
June 14, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.
James P. O'Brien, U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., Lee Loevinger, John H. D. Wigger, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Robert W. Ginnane, Gen. Counsel, Betty Jo Christian, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., for defendants.
James K. Knudson, Paul F. Sullivan, Ben Ivan Melnicoff, Knudson, Sullivan & Badger, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff and intervenors supporting plaintiff.
Harry C. Ames, Jr., E. Stephen Heisley, Ames, Hill & Ames, Washington, D. C., Daniel A. Costigan, Chicago, Ill., Donald Macleay, Russell S. Bernhard, Macleay, Lynch, Channing & Bernhard, Washington, D. C., for intervenors supporting defendants.
Amos M. Mathews, Chicago, Ill., Earl E. Eisenhart, Jr., Commerce Counsel, Southern Railway System, Washington, D. C., Lewin W. Wickes, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Pennsylvania R.R., Philadelphia, Pa., Phil C. Beverly, Gen. Atty., Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., Jacksonville, Fla., John W. Adams, Jr., Gen. Atty., Gulf, Mobile and Ohio R.R., Mobile, Ala., Chas. P. Reynolds, Gen. Atty., Wilkes C. Robinson, Commerce Atty., Seaboard Air Line R. Co., Richmond, Va., John H. Doeringer, Illinois Cent. R.R., Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for intervening railroads.
Before KILEY, Circuit Judge, and ROBSON and AUSTIN, District Judges.
United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.
PER CURIAM.
A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. challenges the Interstate Commerce Commission's report and order of June 15, 1961, refusing Mechling a revised certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate as a common carrier by non-self-propelled vessels with the use of separate towing vessels between Florida and places on the Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. Other parties have intervened both in support or opposition to these proceedings. Subsequent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
