1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 131 S.E.2d
  5. 131 S.E.2d 900 (1963)
 

GUILFORD REALTY & INSURANCE CO. v. BLYTHE BROS. CO.

No. 603.

131 S.E.2d 900 (1963)

260 N.C. 69

GUILFORD REALTY AND INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BLYTHE BROTHERS COMPANY, a corporation, and Howard Construction Company, a corporation, individually and jointly, doing business as Blythe-Howard Companies, Defendants. J. Clarence COGGIN and wife, Betty A. Coggin, Plaintiffs, v. BLYTHE BROTHERS COMPANY, a corporation, and Howard Construction Company, a corporation, individually and jointly, doing business as Blythe-Howard Companies, Defendants.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 19, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sapp & Sapp, Greensboro, for defendants-appellants.

Haworth, Riggs, Kuhn & Haworth and Schoch & Schoch, High Point, for plaintiffs-appellees.

BOBBITT, Justice.

This appeal presents two questions: 1. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? 2. If so, do the facts alleged in the challenged portions of the answer constitute a defense to plaintiff's alleged cause of action?

Defendants, in their demurrer ore tenus, asserted in general terms that the complaint did not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. G.S. § 1-127(6). They did...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases