1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 18 A.D.2d
  5. 18 A.D.2d 1000 (1963)
 

ROZANSKI v. S. M. ROSE CORP.

18 A.D.2d 1000 (1963)

Charles Rozanski, Appellant, v. S. M. Rose Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 4, 1963

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

In our opinion, the record clearly supports the Trial Justice's conclusion that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Our affirmance is based on that ground. Accordingly, we do not deem it necessary to pass upon the question whether the defendant S. M. Rose Corp., by reason of the use of its dealer's license plates (which had expired before the accident), was estopped...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases