UNITED STATES v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY

No. 62-C-707.

213 F.Supp. 800 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, For the Use and Benefit of VICTORY ELECTRIC CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

January 31, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seymour Goldstein, Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

Nevius, Jarvis & Pilz, New York City, for defendant; Emil V. Pilz, J. Edward Davey, Jr., New York City, of counsel.


BARTELS, District Judge.

This is a motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., or under Rule 12(c), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the Court has no jurisdiction over certain causes of action included in the complaint.

The complaint, in which nineteen parties are joined as use plaintiffs, sets forth forty-seven separate causes of action in which the plaintiffs seek...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases