1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 222 F.Supp.
  5. 222 F.Supp. 781 (1963)
 

JOCKMUS v. UNITED STATES

Civ. 8250.

222 F.Supp. 781 (1963)

Leslie H. JOCKMUS and Esther N. Jockmus, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

July 22, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Brodsky, of Aranow, Brodsky, Bohlinger, Einhorn & Dann, New York City, and Max Perl, of Perl, Wolf & Connors, New York City, for plaintiff.

R. Michael Duncan, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edward S. Smith and Jerome Fink, Washington, D. C., Robert C. Zampano, U. S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant.

TIMBERS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1), for refund of federal income taxes for the calendar year 1956 in amount of $31,457.16 claimed to have been erroneously assessed and collected, plus interest.

Following trial on the merits to the Court without a jury, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I

1. This is an action brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases