1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 224 F.Supp.
  5. 224 F.Supp. 778 (1963)
 

UNITED STATES v. HOUCKS

Crim. No. 21509-4.

224 F.Supp. 778 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilbert HOUCKS, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

December 19, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Russell Millin, U. S. Atty., by Joseph P. Teasdale, Asst. U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Harold H. Croghan, Clayton Smalley, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

BECKER, District Judge.

In this prosecution for violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001, the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the information under Rule 12, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on the grounds that Section 1001 is invalid, unconstitutional and void, in the particulars mentioned hereinafter.

The information filed in this case charges that the defendant Wilbert Houcks

"* * * did knowingly, wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases