GRIFFITH v. HENSLEY

No. 36220.

60 Wn.2d 900 (1962)

376 P.2d 448

MEARL GRIFFITH, Appellant, v. WILLIAM HENSLEY et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

November 15, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Mullins, for appellant.


HILL, J.

The plaintiff, Mearl Griffith, sued William Hensley1 for damages as a result of a knifing by William Hicks, allegedly pursuant to a conspiracy between Hensely and Hicks.

The trial judge, after hearing all of the testimony, reached the conclusion that the evidence did not establish the existence of a conspiracy between Hicks and Hensley to commit an act of violence against the plaintiff, and dismissed the action against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases