SCHUETZLE v. DUBA

Civ. No. 901 N. D.

201 F.Supp. 754 (1962)

Hilmer SCHUETZLE, Willis Rodenberg, John Pollock, and Martin Schaeffer, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. William D. DUBA, George O. Crouch, and Walter N. Evans, individually and as members of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee for the State of South Dakota, and Al Jonnson, individually and as State Administrative Officer for the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee for the State of South Dakota, Defendants.

United States District Court D. South Dakota, N. D.

January 24, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maynes & Myers, Aberdeen, S. D., for plaintiffs.

Harold Doyle, U. S. Atty., and Travis Lewin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Sioux Falls, S. D., for defendants.


BECK, District Judge.

This is a rehearing, granted at the request of the defendants because of their complaint that the two day notice under Rule 65(b) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., necessarily invoked as the first hearing was held, did not afford the time they needed to answer the plaintiffs' application for the preliminary injunction which was issued on September 23, 1961.

The controversy which led first to a restraining order and then to an application for and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases