CURTIS BAY TOWING CO. OF PA. v. NATIONAL MARITIME UNION

Civ. A. Nos. 29759, 29760.

206 F.Supp. 741 (1962)

CURTIS BAY TOWING COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. NATIONAL MARITIME UNION OF AMERICA, Seafarers' International Union of North America, international Longshoremen's Association, Local 1291, International Maritime Workers' Union, Steve Cardullo, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of Seafarers' International Union of North America, Richard Askew, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1291, Louis Parise, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of International Maritime Workers' Union, Louis Parise, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of National Maritime Union of America, and Shannon J. Wall, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of International Maritime Workers' Union. P. F. MARTIN, INC. v. NATIONAL MARITIME UNION OF AMERICA, Seafarers' International Union of North America, International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1291, International Maritime Workers' Union, Steve Cardullo, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of Seafarers' International Union of North America, Richard Askew, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of International Maritime Workers' Union, Louis Parise, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of National Maritime Union of America, and Shannon J. Wall, individually, and as an officer and member representative of all the members of International Maritime Workers' Union.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 29, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. Charles Hogg, Jr., of Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Richard H. Markowitz (for motion), Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.


VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

These are two companion actions brought by tugboat operators against various labor organization defendants and certain of their officers and representatives.1 The first cause of action in each Complaint is based on § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 187, and alleges that the defendants induced individuals employed by plaintiffs, Pennsylvania Tidewater Dock Company, and employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases