Order affirmed, with $10, costs and disbursements. It was undisputed that the bill of particulars in question was served within the 30-day period as required by the preclusion order. Accordingly, said order was no longer effective; it became functus officio.
However, its vacatur, although not necessary, was not improper, for the vacatur may tend to prevent confusion at the trial (see Pavia & Co. S. P. A. v. Siegel Chem. Co.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
