1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 105 Ga.
  5. 105 Ga. App. 833 (1962)
 

SHERIFF v. MOORE

39459.

105 Ga. App. 833 (1962)

125 S.E.2d 729

SHERIFF v. MOORE et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bagwell & Hames, James A. Bagwell, for plaintiff in error.

Woodruff, Latimer, Savell, Lane & Williams, Benj. B. Blackburn, III, James A. Stanfield, contra.

EBERHARDT, Judge.

1. "Gross receipts," as used in an insurance policy in providing a method of determining the premium to be paid, is not an ambiguous term. The words mean the whole, entire total receipts, as opposed to "net receipts." Taylor v. Rosenthal, 308 Ky. 4 (213 S.W.2d 435). And under ordinary basic methods of handling accounts the term must be taken to include the whole total gross receipts without any deductions. Commonwealth v. Koppers Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases