MTR. OF HONOLULU v. 5TH AV. COACH LINES


32 Misc.2d 889 (1962)

In the Matter of Honolulu Limited, Petitioner, v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

February 2, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saxe, Bacon & O'Shea (John A. Kiser and Stephen Hochhauser of counsel), for petitioner. Sullivan & Cromwell (David W. Peck of counsel), for respondents.


ABRAHAM J. GELLINOFF, J.

Petitioner applies for an order compelling respondents to permit an inspection of certain books and papers of the respondent corporations. Respondents move pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act for an order dismissing the petition as a matter of law on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a "cause of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases