MATTER OF KAPLAN v. LIPKINS


36 Misc.2d 868 (1962)

In the Matter of Hyman Kaplan, Petitioner, v. Sidney K. Lipkins et al., Doing Business as Lipkin Kahn Co., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

July 18, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan Schwartz for petitioner. Fields, Zimmerman, Klopper, Skodnick & Segall (Ralph Rubel of counsel), for Sidney K. Lipkins and others, respondents. Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (Rose Schneph, Lester H. Marks and Gene Ann Condon of counsel), for Harold Birns, as Commissioner of the Department of Buildings of the City of N. Y., respondent.


LESTER HOLTZMAN, J.

Petitioner moves for an order directing the Department of Buildings of the City of New York to compel the other respondents herein to use and operate the swimming pool located at 89th Street and 151st Avenue, Queens, on a nonprofit basis, pursuant to the terms of a certificate of occupancy. All respondents move to dismiss the petition, pursuant to section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act, upon the ground that it is insufficient in law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases