The appellants in their brief minimize the testimony of the claimant's physician, but it was the carrier's doctor who stated that the claimant suffered from a "very small infarction": and that the final diagnosis at the hospital was "myocardial infarction". While the issue of causal relation was in sharp conflict, which is not unusual in this type of case, the evidence was sufficient to give the board the right of election and which they have determined in favor of the claimant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
