WINEMAN v. GUILMETT

No. 36268.

60 Wn.2d 831 (1962)

376 P.2d 534

MARY ANN WINEMAN, Respondent, v. ROGER A. GUILMETT et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

November 29, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Albert Morrison, for appellants.

Comfort, Dolack & Hansler (Patrick C. Comfort, of counsel), for respondent.


HILL, J.

QUAERE: Where an earnest money receipt, signed by a husband and wife as "purchaser," provides that "If the Purchaser cannot meet the F.H.A. and Loan Agency requirement, Then the earnest money shall be refunded," should the earnest money be refunded when the loan agency requirement has not been met, solely because the wife commenced an action for divorce (there being no question as to the good faith of the divorce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases