COUNTY OF AMADOR v. HUBERTY

Docket No. 10401.

203 Cal.App.2d 664 (1962)

21 Cal. Rptr. 816

COUNTY OF AMADOR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LEOTTA M. HUBERTY, as County Auditor, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents; JACKSON VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Intervener and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 17, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kronick, Moskovitz & Vanderlaan and Adolph Moskovitz for Intervener and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Gard Chisholm, Angelo J. DePaoli, Horace Cecchettini and Schaber & Cecchettini for Defendants and Respondents.


SCHOTTKY, J.

The County of Amador brought this action against Leotta M. Huberty, the county auditor, and Elmer G. Evans, the acting county treasurer, for the purpose of having the legality of a contract between the county and the Jackson Valley Irrigation District determined. The individual defendants had indicated that they had doubts as to the legality of the contract and that they would not issue or pay any warrant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases