LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. TUG BLACKJACK 21


208 F.Supp. 648 (1962)

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, as owner of the BARGE known and called LEHIGH VALLEY NO. 357, Libellant, v. The TUG BLACKJACK 21, her engines and equipment and the TUG PETER MORAN, her engines and equipment and against John J. Reichert, Reichert Towing Line, Inc., and TUG WILLIAM J. MORAN, INC., and Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Respondents.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 7, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pyne, Smith & Wilson, New York City, proctors for libellant, Albert Robin, New York City, of counsel.

Burlingham, Underwood, Barron, Wright & White, New York City, proctors for Moran, Kenneth H. Volk, New York City, of counsel.

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, proctors for respondent, Reichert Towing Line, Inc., Maurice F. Beshlian, New York City, of counsel.


LEVET, District Judge.

This libel of the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, as owner of the barge known as the Lehigh Valley No. 357, seeks recovery against the tug Blackjack 21, and the tug Peter Moran, and against John J. Reichert, Reichert Towing Line, Inc., and Tug William J. Moran, Inc., and Moran Towing & Transportation Company, as respondents, for damage sustained to the said barge Lehigh Valley No. 357 on September 19, 1960, in Gowanus Creek, Brooklyn, New...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases