CATES v. CATES

21525.

217 Ga. 626 (1962)

124 S.E.2d 375

CATES et al. v. CATES, Executrix, et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided February 9, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. B. Lippitt, for plaintiffs in error.

Perry, Walters & Langstaff, Eugene C. Black, contra.


MOBLEY, Justice.

1. The plaintiffs contend that the trial judge erred in making the following finding and ruling in granting the summary judgment: "(1) That under the provisions of Item IX of the Will of Russell R. Cates, deceased, the deceased gave to his brother, James Cates, one of the Executors, an option to purchase his business known as the `Albany Amusement Company' at its book value less 20%, which amount would represent the reasonable market value of said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases