1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 200 Cal.App.2d
  5. 200 Cal.App.2d 639 (1962)
 

BLUM v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 19497.

200 Cal.App.2d 639 (1962)

19 Cal. Rptr. 574

ROBERT BLUM et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents; JAMES M. SMITH et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 23, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sylvester Andriano, Ferrari & Ferrari and Louis Ferrari, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.

Lowenthal & Lowenthal for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, Thomas M. O'Connor, Public Utilities Counsel, Robert M. Desky and McMorris M. Dow, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Respondents.

BRAY, P.J.

Defendants and cross-complainants, Eaton & Smith, appeal from that portion of the judgment which provided that its recovery from defendant and cross-defendant City and County of San Francisco (hereafter referred to as the City) be without interest for any period prior to judgment.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Does section 3287, Civil Code, apply to the City and County of San Francisco?

2. Is there any other issue on this appeal?...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases