1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 37 Misc.2d
  5. 37 Misc.2d 795 (1962)
 

MTR. OF STUBERFIELD v. LONG IS. SAV. ASSN.

37 Misc.2d 795 (1962)

In the Matter of William F. Stuberfield, Petitioner, v. Long Island City Savings and Loan Association et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

November 27, 1962

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan & Cromwell (William E. Willis and John H. Higgs of counsel), for Long Island City Savings and Loan Association, respondent. Sylvester & Harris (Alvin McKinley Sylvester of counsel), for petitioner.

NICHOLAS M. PETTE, J.

The respondents Keller, Carlin, Becker, Hopkins, Mackenzie, Smith, Bennett and Fulmer move for an order in this proceeding to dismiss the petition of the petitioner on the ground that it does not state a claim for relief as against them.

With the exception of the respondent Mackenzie, none of said respondents is an officer of the association. There is no allegation in the petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases