DE VITO v. PERILLO


36 Misc.2d 791 (1962)

Madeline J. De Vito, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Perillo, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

July 2, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fink & Pavia for plaintiff. Eli Vigliano for defendant.


GEORGE P. STIER, J.

In an action for an accounting, the plaintiff moves, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an interlocutory judgment "directing that such accounting be heard and determined, as required by law".

The plaintiff, in support of the motion, contends that, pursuant to an agreement between defendant and plaintiff, defendant was appointed her exclusive agent to sell property she owned in Italy. The plaintiff states...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases