PEARCE v. VILLAGE OF EDINA

No. 38,464.

263 Minn. 553 (1962)

118 N.W. (2d) 659

KATHERINE ELIZABETH PEARCE AND ANOTHER v. VILLAGE OF EDINA.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 5, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorsey, Owen, Barber, Marquart & Windhorst, Maynard B. Hasselquist, and Edward J. Schwartzbauer, for appellant.

Brill & Brill, for respondents.

Orville C. Peterson and David J. Kennedy, for League of Minnesota Municipalities, amicus curiae.

Keith M. Stidd, City Attorney, and D.J. Shama, Assistant City Attorney, for City of Minneapolis, amicus curiae.


THOMAS GALLAGHER, JUSTICE.

Plaintiffs, Katherine Pearce and Marie Pearce, sisters, bring this action against defendant, village of Edina, for a declaratory judgment invalidating certain zoning ordinances of defendant under which their real property in the village has been zoned for office building purposes with building restrictions which limit the use of such property in many respects and which deny them the right to construct thereon a shopping center or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases