HOWARD v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 20260.

205 Cal.App.2d 602 (1962)

23 Cal. Rptr. 183

SAMUEL HOWARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

July 13, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herron & Winn and Manoucher Farzan for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and Donald J. Garibaldi, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.


KAUFMAN, P.J.

By stipulation of the parties, the sole issue presented to the trial court was whether the respondent, City and County of San Francisco, was estopped from asserting the defense of noncompliance with section 87 of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco, which requires that all claims against the city must be presented to the controller within 60 days after the occurrence from which it is claimed the damages have arisen.

The trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases