Chemical Tank Lines, Inc.
v.
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued December 1, 1961.
March 13, 1962.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Miles Warner, Assistant Counsel, with him Joseph I. Lewis, Chief Counsel, and David Stahl, Attorney General, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, appellant.
Harry H. Frank, with him Richard H. Rea, Robert J. Stewart, Christian V. Graf, and McNees, Wallace & Nurick, and Anderson, Ports, May, Beers, Blakey & Stewart, for protestant carriers, appellants.
Carl Helmetag, Jr., with him Richard E. Costello, Lockwood W. Fogg, Jr., Malcolm R. Warnock, and Harris J. Latta, Jr., for protestant railroads, appellants.
Robert H. Shertz, with him Don B. Blenko, Robert H. Young, and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for applicants, appellees.
Robert R. Wertz, for cement producer, appellee.
Thomas E. Weaver and Weaver & Weaver, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
George F. Coffin, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
Louis M. Stamberg and Morris Gerber, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
W. Alan Baird, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
Bernard Eskin, Martin B. Louis, and Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
Ernest Scott, and Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
John F. Headly, George G. Chandler, and Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
J.H. Ward Hinkson, for cement producer, interested party, under Rule 46.
James McI. Henderson, General Counsel, and Joseph J. Gercke, Chief, Compliance Division, Bureau of Restraint of Trade, Federal Trade Commission, of the Washington, D.C. Bar, for Federal Trade Commission, amicus curiae, under Rule 46.
Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN and EAGEN, JJ.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
OPINION PER CURIAM, March 13, 1962:
The order of the Superior Court is affirmed upon the opinion of President Judge RHODES, reported in 193 Pa.Super. 607, 165 A.2d 668 (1960).
Justice ALPERN took no part in the consideration or decision of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.