1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 37 N.J.
  5. 37 N.J. 39 (1962)
 

CITY OF HACKENSACK v. RUBINSTEIN

37 N.J. 39 (1962)

178 A.2d 625

CITY OF HACKENSACK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. RUTH RUBINSTEIN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 5, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Theodore W. Trautwein argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Bruce F. Banta argued the cause for all respondents.

Mr. David A. Gelber, attorney for respondents, P. & J. Realty Co., Block, Bianco and Tempio, Markay Realty Co., Inc., Slaff, Med. Realty Corp., and United States Realty Co., Inc., Lax, and J. & G. Realty Co.

Messrs. Knowlton & Lennan, attorneys for respondents, Moore and Bollerman Realty Co.

Messrs. Winne & Banta, attorneys for respondents, Hackensack Gardens, Inc.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

In 1960 appellant, City of Hackensack, completed an extensive reassessment of all realty located within the city. Thereafter, more than 300 taxpayers, including the respondents, appealed to the Bergen County Board of Taxation seeking a reduction of their assessments. From determinations reducing the assessments, Hackensack appealed to the Division of Tax Appeals, Department of the Treasury (hereinafter the "Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases