UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Nelson WOODSON, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Joseph HILL, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Warren S. GRUBER, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Joseph H. DECKMAN, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Jack A. RICHARDSON, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
John CISSEL, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 19, 1962.
Decided April 27, 1962.
As Amended June 1, 1962.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Patrick M. Ryan, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Richard A. Solomon, Atty., Dept. of Justice, was on the brief, for appellant in each case. Mr. Irwin A. Seibel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered an appearance for appellant in each case. Mr. Sidney Harris, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered an appearance for appellant in No. 16,750.
Mr. John J. Wilson, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. John J. Carmody and Charles J. Steele, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee in No. 16,750.
Mr. Francis M. Shea, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Richard T. Conway and William H. Dempsey, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee in No. 16,765.
Mr. Francis J. Kelly, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee in No. 16,763.
Messrs. Paul F. Interdonato, Theodore Lombard and James T. Reilly, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for appellee in No. 16,764.
Mr. Ellsworth T. Simpson, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee in No. 16,766.
Messrs. William F. Kelly, Richard H. Nicolaides and W. V. T. Justis, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for appellee in No. 16,767.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
An indictment charged that eight District of Columbia construction companies and six individuals had conspired to restrain trade, in violation of Section 3 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 3. The individuals, who concededly had acted only as corporate officers, moved to dismiss as to them, and the District Court granted their motion, holding that corporate officers may not be indicted under Section 3 of the Sherman Act for acts done in their representative...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
