1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 205 Cal.App.2d
  5. 205 Cal.App.2d 556 (1962)
 

PEERLESS OAKLAND LAUNDRY CO. v. HICKMAN

Docket No. 19853.

205 Cal.App.2d 556 (1962)

23 Cal. Rptr. 105

PEERLESS OAKLAND LAUNDRY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SYDNEY HICKMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

July 11, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oswald G. Ingold for Defendant and Appellant.

Weinmann, Rode, Burnhill & Moffitt, Robert C. Clifford and Cyril Viadro for Plaintiff and Respondent.

KAUFMAN, P.J.

This is an appeal by Sydney Hickman, a former employee of the respondent, Peerless Oakland Laundry Company, from a judgment enjoining him from soliciting and diverting the business of certain former customers of Peerless.

As grounds for reversal, the appellant contends that: (1) In the absence of an express enforceable contract, equity will not enjoin a former employee from competing fairly; (2) there is no evidence that his competition was unfair...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases