LEEK v. STATE

[No. 32, September Term, 1962.]

229 Md. 526 (1962)

184 A.2d 808

LEEK v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 22, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Lee Kaplan, with whom was Michael Lee Kaplan on the brief, for the appellant.

Robert F. Sweeney, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O'Donnell, State's Attorney for Baltimore City, Joseph G. Koutz, Deputy State's Attorney, and Russell J. White, Assistant State's Attorney, on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ.


Decided October 22, 1962. Certiorari denied, 372 U.S. 946.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, convicted by a jury of rape but acquitted of perverted practice, claims prejudice because he was required to be tried on both charges in the same trial, he having been arraigned on the perverted practice charge but a few minutes before the trial began. The claim of prejudice is refuted by the fact the jury found him not guilty of perverted practice. If the cases had been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases