1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 183 A.2d
  5. 183 A.2d 566 (1962)
 

BALDWIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos. 2971, 2972.

183 A.2d 566 (1962)

Talmadge DeWitt BALDWIN, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided August 2, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Bachrach, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Assistant Corp. Counsel, Hubert B. Pair and Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel, for appellee.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Appellant was charged in two informations with the practice of podiatry without a license.1 The informations were based on two instances of treatment, occurring about a month apart: the first of a woman who came to appellant for treatment of a corn, and the second of an investigator from the Woman's Bureau of the Metropolitan Police Department. Appellant was found guilty on both informations, and given a sentence of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases