BORDEAUX v. STENBERG MFG. CORP.


16 A.D.2d 727 (1962)

C. George Bordeaux et al., Respondents, v. Stenberg Manufacturing Corp. et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

April 13, 1962


Plaintiffs contend that their proof of the items of the inventory of the manufacturing business included in the sale will "require the examination of a long account" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 466) and thus that a compulsory reference was proper. Defendants, while asserting that such proof is not that of a "long account" within the intendment of the statute, stated in open court, upon the argument, that they would nevertheless consent to a reference, provided an Official Referee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases