1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 39 N.J.
  5. 39 N.J. 34 (1962)
 

BEADLING v. SIROTTA

39 N.J. 34 (1962)

186 A.2d 680

GEORGE BEADLING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. E. BERNARD SIROTTA AND SAMUEL M. LANGSTON COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 4, 1962.

Decided December 17, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-appellant E. Bernard Sirotta (Messrs. McCord, Farrell and Eynon, attorneys).

Mr. Charles A. McGeary argued the cause for the defendant-appellant Samuel M. Langston Company (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The defendants' applications for summary judgment were denied in the Law Division for the reasons expressed in the opinion reported at 71 N.J.Super. 182 (1961). The Appellate Division granted leave to appeal (R.R. 2:2-3) and we certified the matter while it was awaiting argument there. The Joint Appendix which the parties have submitted is confined largely to the pleadings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases