1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 16 Wis.2d
  5. 16 Wis.2d 55 (1962)
 

ANDERSON v. SAUNDERS

16 Wis.2d 55 (1962)

ANDERSON, Respondent, v. SAUNDERS and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 6, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Everson, Whitney, O'Melia & Everson of Green Bay, and oral argument by James L. Everson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Boltz & Steinbrinck of Green Bay, and oral argument by Richard A. Boltz.

HALLOWS, J.

The questions on appeal are: Did the trial court err in admitting the evidence of the defendant's arrest; and if so, was the error prejudicial? The respondent claims no error was committed because the defendant had admitted to the officer she exceeded the legal speed limit and the question concerning the arrest was a natural consequence of that admission. It is also claimed the testimony was not prejudicial because the defendant's version of the accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases