Judgment affirmed.
Testimony that defendant was sought for questioning in connection with other crimes was received without objection and was, in large part, adduced on cross-examination by defendant's counsel. There was also no objection to testimony that defendant remained silent when questioned as to the crime of bribery alleged in the indictment; nor was any motion made to strike out such testimony. Under such circumstances, and in view of the fact that the proof...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
