Order affirmed, without costs.
The writ was based on relator's claim that his trial in 1936 for murder in the first degree proceeded in his absence. More specifically, relator alleges that the jury, after retiring to deliberate, returned on several occasions to the courtroom in his absence and had certain testimony read to them. The minutes of the trial show that the jury returned three times to the courtroom and requested that certain testimony and certain portions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
