YOUNG v. EXUM

Equity No. 2955.

179 A.2d 490 (1962)

Anita O'Keeffe YOUNG, Ex'x v. Edith Young EXUM et al.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

April 6, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Newport, David Hartfiled, Jr., David W. Wallace, New York City, for complainant.

DeSimone & DeSimone, Florie DeSimone, Herbert F. DeSimone, Providence, Friedman & Friedman, Hyman R. Friedman, William K. Friedman, New York City, for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

After our opinion herein 179 A.2d 107, was filed, the respondents by permission of the court presented a motion for leave to reargue setting forth therein certain reasons on which they base their contention that justice requires a reargument of the cause.

We have carefully considered those reasons and are of the opinion that they are not based on any matter which was not fully considered and passed upon directly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases