PER CURIAM.
The parties stipulated the vehicle was reasonably worth $3,000 on November 14, 1960. The plaintiff introduced evidence the reasonable market value shortly before the seizure was $5,500. Apparently the defendant's son had been permitted to replevy the vehicle and retain possession until November 14, 1960. The defendant did not offer evidence. There is nothing in the record to indicate the vehicle was damaged or that its value changed other than by ordinary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.