CROUCHLEY v. PAMBIANCHI


149 Conn. 512 (1962)

CHARLES CROUCHLEY, JR., ET AL. v. LEO J. PAMBIANCHI ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 18, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip H. Smith, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

J. Harold Merrick, for the appellee (named defendant).

Louis Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Albert L. Coles, attorney general, for the appellee (defendant commissioner of motor vehicles).

BALDWIN, C. J., KING, MURPHY, SHEA and ALCORN, JS.


ALCORN, J.

The controlling issue before us is the jurisdiction of the trial court to entertain an appeal from the action of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles in purporting to reinstate a certificate approving the location of a proposed gasoline station. The corrections which the plaintiffs ask to have made in the finding do not bear significantly on the issue.

On or about April 6, 1959, the defendant Pambianchi applied to the commissioner for approval...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases