FRANKLIN v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Docket No. 10249.

204 Cal.App.2d 450 (1962)

22 Cal. Rptr. 331

JAMES E. FRANKLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Defendants and Respondents. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES E. FRANKLIN et al., Defendants and Appellants. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

June 6, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Ross, Jr., for Appellants.

Everett M. Glenn, City Attorney, and E.R. Vaughn, Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.


PEEK, P.J.

These appeals arise out of two separate actions which were consolidated for trial. In the first (superior court number 124155), James E. and Marvelene Franklin, husband and wife, appeal from an adverse judgment in an action in which they sought a declaration that certain provisions of the zoning ordinance of the City of Sacramento were unconstitutional as to them and to compel the defendants to rezone plaintiffs' property. In the second action (superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases