LeFELT v. NASAROW


76 N.J. Super. 576 (1962)

185 A.2d 217

FLORENCE LeFELT AND REUBEN LeFELT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WASILI NASAROW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 29, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel Doan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys for appellant Aetna Insurance Company; Mr. James H. McLeod, attorney for appellant The Phoenix Insurance Company; Mr. Aaron Dines, on the brief).

Mr. Archie Elkins argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Robert A. Elkins, on the brief).

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Law Division. LeFelt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J.Super. 538 (Law Div...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases