STATE v. PATFOL, INC.


76 N.J. Super. 572 (1962)

185 A.2d 215

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PATFOL, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND VINCENT SULLIVAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HERMAN SMITH, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 26, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney), for plaintiff as respondent and appellant, movant.

Mr. Philip C. Geibel, attorney for appellants Patfol, Inc. and Vincent Sullivan, opposed.

Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., attorney for respondent Herman Smith, Jr., respondent.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.


PER CURIAM.

These motions for reargument of our decision of September 21, 1962 (State v. Patfol, Inc., 76 N.J.Super. 287 (App. Div. 1962)) in these appeals are based upon an argument constructed from legislative history which was not presented at all by the State in the brief or argument of the appeals, nor, so far as we are aware, before the trial courts. Although we are certain that the failure to present this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases