Defendant claims that it had cancelled the insurance policy by reason of the fraud of the named insured who had falsely represented that she was the owner of the automobile, whereas in fact the actual owner was the person who operated it at the time of the accident.
Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Justice at Special Term that issues of fact are presented and that such issues must be resolved after a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
