1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 206 F.Supp.
  5. 206 F.Supp. 432 (1962)
 

DAUPHIN CORPORATION v. SENTINEL ALARM CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 2356.

206 F.Supp. 432 (1962)

DAUPHIN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SENTINEL ALARM CORPORATION, Edward J. Lavino, II, and James J. Davis, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

June 29, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Sinclair, Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, Del., and Windels, Currie & Rice, New York City, for plaintiff.

Clair John Killoran, E. Dickinson Griffenberg, Jr., Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington, Del., for defendants Sentinel Alarm Corp. and Edward J. Lavino, II.

John M. Bader, John Biggs, III, and Bader & Biggs, Wilmington, Del., for defendant James J. Davis.

LEAHY, Senior District Judge.

Dauphin Corporation alleges defendants Sentinel Alarm Corporation, Edward J. Lavino, and James J. Davis have committed fraud under the Securities Acts of 1934 (Rule X-10B-5) and, alternatively, under the Securities Acts of 1933. The crux of plaintiff's claim is that it was induced by alleged untrue and misleading statements of material facts and non-disclosures on the part of defendants to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases