1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 75 N.J.
  5. 75 N.J. Super. 560 (1962)
 

HOAGLAND v. SPRINGER

75 N.J. Super. 560 (1962)

183 A.2d 678

ELMER T. HOAGLAND, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM C. SPRINGER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, CUMMINS DIESEL METROPOLITAN, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DEFENDANTS, AND CUMMINS DIESEL MICHIGAN, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 5, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herman D. Michaels argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper and Vanderbilt, attorneys).

Mr. Francis M. Seaman argued the cause for respondent Hoagland (Messrs. Seaman & Clark, attorneys; Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief).

Mr. Leroy H. Mattson argued the cause for respondent Springer (Messrs. Troast, Mattson & Madden, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendant Cummins Diesel Michigan, Inc. (hereinafter Michigan) sought leave, pursuant to R.R. 2:2-3, to appeal from two Law Division orders respectively denying its motions to dismiss plaintiff's action and defendant Springer's cross-claim, or in lieu thereof to quash and vacate the return of the summons served upon it. The grounds for the motions were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases