1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 231 Or.
  5. 231 Or. 400 (1962)
 

BOYD ET AL v. LATOURETTE

231 Or. 400 (1962)

373 P.2d 418

BOYD ET AL v. LATOURETTE

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 6, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Caldwell, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Hibbard, Jacobs, Caldwell & Kincart.

William E. Schumaker, District Attorney, Oregon City, argued the cause and submitted a brief for respondents.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

Plaintiffs, certified appraisers employed in the county assessor's office in Clackamas county, initiated a mandamus proceeding against the county Board of Commissioners to require the board to revise its budget estimate for salaries to be paid county certified appraisers. Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying a peremptory writ.

In its 1961-1962 budget Clackamas county made the following provisions for appraisers to be employed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases