CONNOR v. MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO.


15 Wis.2d 614 (1962)

CONNOR, Appellant, v. MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 6, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Smith, Puchner, Tinkham & Smith of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard P. Tinkham.

For the respondent there was a brief by Rieser, Stafford, Rosenbaum & Smith of Madison, and oral argument by Willard S. Stafford.


CURRIE, J.

The new trial was granted upon the ground that prejudicial error had been committed in the admission of evidence. Therefore, the issues on this appeal are whether error did occur in this respect, and if it did, whether it was prejudicial.

The easement for the pipeline extends in an east-west direction over a strip 75 feet in width across both forties of Connor's land. It is conceded that the west forty only has value as agricultural land; that is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases