1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 357 S.W.2d
  5. 357 S.W.2d 271 (1962)
 

HINK v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BEAVER WATER DISTRICT

No. 5-2794.

357 S.W.2d 271 (1962)

Dr. Henry HINK et al. Appellants, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BEAVER WATER DISTRICT et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 21, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff R. Rice, Bentonville, and Walter R. Niblock, Fayetteville, for appellants.

Little & Enfield, Bentonville, Leflar & Croxton, Rogers, Mehaffy, Smith & Williams, by Herschel H. Friday, Jr., James E. Westbrook, Little Rock, for appellees.

GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

By this proceeding, which is apparently a test suit, the appellants as citizens and taxpayers seek to obtain a declaratory judgment and an injunction preventing the appellees from carrying out a proposed arrangement by which four cities in northwest Arkansas are undertaking to obtain a supplementary water supply. The chancellor found the proposal to be valid in all respects, sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and dismissed the suit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases